People saying that Apple didn’t innovate with the iPhone 5 are so clueless. They look at iPhone 5 pictures dans say: meh? They have to hold it an feel it before making any judgement. 

If Samsung is so “rapidly innovating” maybe it is because their original smartphones were so crappy and in need of major improvements. Who knows.

When does a device change is seen as an innovation instead of just a mere improvement? Where do you draw the line? 

Is this a good assumption to think that if older iPhone models are still selling very well, their manufacturing costs much lower than the iPhone 5, the impact on Apple’s margins could be positive. right?