Tag Results
11 posts tagged iphone mini

11 posts tagged iphone mini
“The iPhone represents 56% of Apple’s revenues as of today why the Mac line represents 10% only. Still, the Mac line has four categories: Mac mini, Mac Pro, Mac Book, MacBook Pro. It is clear the next step for the iPhone is to have a new line.”
How Apple can define “low” when speaking about the low end iPhone? Interesting piece which shows how hard it will be for Apple to fit the iPhone mini in their product line.
“
Here is the thing, look at the Mac product line. There are four categories (iMac, Mac mini, MacBook, Mac Pro). The traditional computer is a thing of the past, yet Apple maintains four different categories of Mac. Now, look at the iPhone product line. There is essentially one category. I can’t count previous generation iPhones as separate categories because they are essentially the same form factor.
So, how could Apple justify keeping it that way for a product line that generates more than half of its revenues? Apple will fork the iPhone into different categories (iPhone, iPhone mini). It is written all over the sky. Just look up!
”Rumors about a plastic and transparent case for the low-end iPhone are surfacing… Could this be the return of the bondi-iMac casing?

“Apple would never switch to Intel… Apple would never put video on an iPod… Apple would never use the name iPhone 5… Apple would never release an iPad mini… Apple would never change the iPhone’s aspect ratio… Apple would never release two iPads in a year… But Steve Jobs said… But Tim Cook said… But Phil Schiller said…”
Rene Ritchie for iMore.
Apple will do a less expansive iPhone.
“When Apple find a way to do a low-end iPhone (or a cheap iPhone, depending of the way you look at it) that is not a piece of plastic junk, they’ll do it and ship it.”
“For Apple, creating a low end iPhone isn’t just like creating just a smaller or cheaper device compared to the full version. Apple usually creates something special for each device category. Look at the iPod line. Each of them cannot be seen to be a lower end version of the other. The nano or the shuffle are very distinct in their nature and features. I expect Apple to to the same in creating the iPhone mini.”
“It is a mistake to think that by introducing a low end iPhone, Apple margins would dangerously decrease. Apple can create a cheaper device much cheaper to mass produce with high quality and proven technologies that would do little harm to their beloved margins.”
A few thoughts on the latest report of a “less-expensive” iPhone by Jessica E. Lessin for The Wall Street Journal:
1) This report seems to surface every year, including by the same Wall Street Journal that is reporting the news today.
2) That said, there does seem to be more gathering momentum around the idea of a “cheap iPhone” this time around. I smell a faint hint of Apple.
3) But Apple already sells “cheap iPhones”: the iPhone 4S is currently $99 with a two-year contract and the iPhone 4 is free with the same contract. Hard to get cheaper than “free”. (But: see point 6 below.)
4) So perhaps this has to do more with perception. The current cheaper iPhones must lose some luster as they’re simply older devices at a discounted price. Maybe this new “cheap iPhone” would be a complete makeover with the same internals as the older models but with a new build to entice buyers.
5) Along those lines, I find it hard to believe Apple would simply do a “cheap iPhone” — it would have to be a different product from the flagship version in some other way. Offering various colors is an obvious approach, but I think there would have to be something else as well. There are no “cheap iPads” or “cheap iPods”, there are significantly different versions (iPad mini, iPod nano, etc) at different price points.
6) Or perhaps this is all simply meant for other markets where the iPhone does not sell as well (and subsidies matter far less, or don’t exist at all). As WSJ notes, the iPhone is still the top selling smartphone in the U.S. But that’s not the case in other markets, and China has been particularly troublesome. Apple probably doesn’t want to just cede a billion potential users to cheap Android devices.
7) But I don’t think Apple would do a device just focused on particular foreign markets. Their product lines are very simple and for the most part worldwide. I imagine that any “cheap iPhone” would be on sale in the U.S. as well. So… pre-paid?
8) I do think Apple has to be careful here. While Gene Munster doesn’t seem too worried about the margins (thinking this phone would attract users that wouldn’t normally buy an iPhone), if such a device was popular enough, it would definitely drive down Apple’s famous margins. Users, of course, won’t and shouldn’t give a shit about that, but investors will (and Apple should — the iPhone dominates their bottom line). Just wait until we see what the iPad mini does to the margin this quarter.
Point 4) et 5) are the main reason to create new and lower end devices.
First, a comment from John Gruber:
“Apple’s strategy for lower-priced phones for the last four years has been to sell one- and two-year-old models at a discount. But perhaps the glass-backed iPhone 4 and 4S (and, come next year, the aluminum-backed iPhone 5) are inherently too expensive to produce to hit certain lower price points. Maybe Apple just wants to get rid of the last remaining products using those old grody 30-pin adapter ports. But whatever the reason, this would be a significant strategic shift.”
Selling the previous two years models to address the lower end market may have worked in 2009 or 2010 but today, this strategy is showing sign of inadequacy against the proliferation of cheap Androïd devices.
I have the feeling that the iPhone 4 or 4S aren’t that cheap to produce even after two years of mass production. Creating an updated design with cheap components and cheap manufacturing needs will not only help protect current margins but would help keep the iPhone line fresh from the top to bottom. People like “new” things in new cases, new colors and new textures even if internal components aren’t state of the art.
A fresh iPhone entirely new and designed for the low end is mandatory. And only Apple can creating something great without falling in the trap of all cheap Androïd plastic devices. Not sure about this? I invite you to consider the just released iPad mini.